Archive for the ‘Movies’ Category

Weekly News Roundup (1 June 2014)

Sunday, June 1st, 2014

That’s more like it. A solid news week, where I had a good choice of stories, and even discarded a few that I didn’t think would be worthy of an extended mention. Like this story about a possible breakthrough in PS4 jailbreaking – almost no other news sources carried this story, and so the authoritativeness of this news story was questionable.

Or this story about how the Wii U has outsold the PS4 in Japan. This could be due to issues with the PS4, such as stock or lack of games, or an issue with the Wii U (which isn’t doing that well either – so I guess nobody wants next-gen consoles in Japan), or just consumer trends. The fact that the Japanese video gaming market has always been a bit different to the rest of the world also means that this wasn’t the best story to cover.

Moving away from gaming, we have this story about the latest stats from the “six strikes” regime in the U.S. – an interesting read if you’re interested in stats and stuff, but the gist of it is that U.S. pirates seem to be more persistent than pirates say in France, where the first warning is usually enough to deter them from doing it again (whereas 30% of those that receive a first warning continue to pirate in the U.S).

And then we have this story where UK MPs are calling on Google to do more on piracy. I don’t even care what my own country’s MPs say, let alone what UK MPs have to on an issue they know little if anything about!

So that was the news that didn’t make the headlines here, let’s see which ones did.

Copyright

Cinavia Logo

A German firm claims to have broken Cinavia!

One of the most annoying, and hence successful anti-piracy measures ever devised has been broken. Cinavia anti-piracy protection, which has become more and more prevalent in Blu-ray releases, has been broken, according to a German company that has been working on it for years.

For those that haven’t had the pleasure of dealing with Cinavia, it’s an anti-piracy technology that embeds a watermark into the audio track, one that cannot be removed even via numerous re-encodings (both digitally and analog re-recordings). Once a Cinavia compatible player (which is all Blu-ray players, even ones on the PC, since 2012) detects the watermark, it warns the users of their transgressions and then does one of several things ranging from muting the audio to stopping playback altogether.

The common technique for dealing with Cinavia has been to substitute the audio with one from a release that does not use Cinavia, or to use a player that doesn’t support it. German company Pixbyte says they have now produced a tool that allows Cinavia encoded videos to be stripped of the Cinavia watermark, with only the audio needing to be re-encoded. On average, the company says, it only takes 20 minutes to get rid of Cinavia.

Pixbyte says they don’t fear any legal repercussions, as removing Cinavia isn’t the same as removing AACS or other types of copy protection. This is because Cinavia doesn’t prevent copying per se. I’m not sure if this line of argument will hold up in court though, since CSS and AACS technically doesn’t prevent you from copying the files either – they just come out all scrambled at the other end and unplayable. Much less playable than a Cinavia-borked file, but the idea is nearly the same. Time will tell if Pixbyte is right, or if they’ll be embroiled in some legal drama.

——

Spotify Logo

Has Spotify helped to reduce piracy? Anecdotal evidence suggests it has, but the music industry says otherwise.

It’s common knowledge that services like Spotify have helped greatly in the fight against piracy. But some in the music industry do not believe that making available cheap or free legal alternatives is an answer to the piracy problem. Case in point, Australia’s music royalty collection organization, APRA AMCOS, recently wrote an op-ed piece blasting those that say legal alternatives are the way forward in the piracy fight (specifically in response to those who blame the lack of legal options for the high Game of Thrones piracy rate in Australia). APRA AMCOS’s Andrew Harris says the introduction of Spotify in Australia has done nothing to combat piracy, with piracy rate just as high as when Spotify and other legal services weren’t available.

By dragging Spotify into the Game of Thrones fight, Spotify had to respond and respond they did. Spotify’s managing director here in Australia, Kate Vale, rejected Harris’s assertions, saying there are plenty of anecdotal evidence around to suggest that Spotify is helping to win the war against piracy, and that the company is currently working on a project to illustrate just how effective Spotify has been. Vale also noted that music piracy was reduced by 30% in Sweden in the six years that Spotify has been available there, for example.

The problem as I see it is that the music industry has managed to indoctrinate themselves into believing the often hyped up and biased stats that they have paid to have produced. It’s as if they don’t want services like Spotify to actually be responsible for reductions in piracy, because these may not be things that helps labels make more money, and also because they’re platforms the music industry did not come up with themselves. It also makes their lobbying efforts harder if there is seen to be a simple and industry based solution, even if that solution comes from a different (I.T., Internet) industry. They’d rather be proven wrong about new harsher laws and anti-consumer technological solutions, than to be proven right that piracy is a pricing and availability issue.

Gaming

Ubisoft Logo

Ubisoft screws up another release thanks to DRM

Ubisoft is back in the headlines, and unfortunately, it’s again to do with DRM. Unfortunately, the much hyped and eagerly anticipated ‘Watch Dogs’ could not be released without a DRM controversy, as the PC version of the game was practically unplayable as the rush to play it on launch day crashed Ubisoft’s Uplay service. Despite the game having an offline mode, it also required online authentication with Uplay before gamers could be allowed to go offline. And so, PC gamers were left with an unplayable game they just purchased or pre-ordered at full cost.

This kind of thing has become too common to be ignored, and to be fair, it has less to do with DRM, and more to do with companies not investing enough in excess online capacity. You’d think with an industry so reliant on pre-orders, that they could and should have been able to predict the amount of traffic expected on launch day and plan for it. It’s just symptomatic of an industry that do not seem to have much regard for their most important asset: their customers. But with so many so willing to pre-paying for something that hasn’t really been properly reviewed (thanks to embargoes in place), perhaps it’s us gamers that are encouraging this bad behavior of treating us for granted. Because, the truth is, we do end up paying (and pre-paying) for all sorts of crap, and put up with even more unacceptable crap, and so maybe we do want to be taken for granted!

——

I would never take you, dear reader, for granted of course. That’s why I painstakingly hand pick through all the useless and boring news stories for you, personally, every week. Beacuse I have to maintain a high standard of quality. It’s definitely not because I was lazy or busy playing video games or anything like that.  Ahem.

See you next week.

Weekly News Roundup (4 May 2014)

Sunday, May 4th, 2014

Welcome to another WNR. It’s getting colder here where I am, winter is certainly coming (in the southern hemisphere). Makes it just that much harder to get work started, especially on a Sunday.

Let’s get started anyway.

Copyright

Aereo Antenna Array

Aereo’s dime sized antennas – smart or too clever for their own good?

Trying to abide by copyright laws in the digital age can be tricky. Or rather, there are some tricky ways you can try to obey the letter of the law, if not exactly in spirit. Which is what Aereo’s business model seems like to me – completely legal (as tested in court, twice already), but does not quite pass the smell test.

For those that don’t know, Aereo allows subscribers to stream TV channels to their mobile devices, and even record programs to a cloud based DVR. Aereo gets around the “problem” of paying for a broadcast or re-transmission license by providing each subscriber with their own dime sized TV antennas, and each antenna is only used to provide content to one unique subscriber. So instead of broadcast or re-transmission, there’s a 1-to-1 relationship between each received signal and streamed or recorded content. It’s a technically sound and legal solution, but it’s seems to me like a ridiculous solution intended to be used as a loophole, and not a genuine piece of innovation.

Still, the only outcome I would want to see in the much publicized Aereo Supreme Court case is a victory for the start-up. With the lower courts and the appeals court already siding with Aereo, the Supreme Court would have to set new precedent, and do so in an incorrect way (not the first time with this court), to side with big business interests (again, not the first time with this court).

——

Going to the cinemas and not get accosted by law enforcement is getting harder and harder these days it appears. While wearing a pair of Google Glass to the cinema (even if it is turned off, and only using it as normal prescription glasses) might be the very definition of asking for trouble, having a brick slider phone in your pocket is surely not going to attract any trouble, right? Well, an elderly woman in Provo Utah was not so lucky, accused of trying to record a movie with her “classic” phone and thrown out into the street for her troubles.

LG KC780

Is a slider phone like this a dangerous movie piracy tool?

The woman says the phone was in her pocket after her husband left half way through the movie and handed it to her. She was also using a closed captioning device, which may have been mistaken for recording equipment by whoever dobbed her in.

For me, even if she had been recording the movie on her phone, as long as it’s not disturbing other cinema goers, is it really such a big deal. The quality of the recording on a handheld phone, especially a classic slider style brick (probably only has a recording resolution of 640×480), is no threat to studios worried their films will end up online. The fact that the police officers who arrived to throw her out apparently did not find anything incriminating on the phone suggests no recording took place anyway.

So it looks this is a case of more collateral damage in the paranoid driven War on Piracy. Going to the cinemas has never been so dangerous, and it almost makes you wanna, I don’t know, download the movie and watch it at home or something. I mean, that’s what the studios are trying to achieve right? To scare people from going to the cinemas and making piracy look like the more attractive choice? No?

High Definition

Sony has issued the strongest indication yet that physical media may be on the way out. The company wrote down nearly a quarter of a billion dollars worth of assets in its disc manufacturing business, including Blu-ray manufacturing, due to slowing demand. You can blame Netflix for that, I guess.

Blu-ray Player

Blu-ray is unlikely to reach the sales highs that DVDs once enjoyed, but it’s not going away any time soon

Those that follow our weekly Blu-ray sales analysis will be able to spot the trend of a rapidly slowing DVD business, and a slower than expected take up of Blu-ray (unable to make up for the losses in DVD revenue). While Blu-ray is still growing in the US, it’s doing so slowly. Much of the growth in the home entertainment industry is coming from purely digital services like Netflix. And while both the PS4 and Xbox One is using Blu-ray discs for distributing games, even the gaming business is moving towards digital streaming and downloads. Sony has invested heavily in its digital distribution networks in recent times for both its media and gaming businesses, a sign that the company is fairly certain its predictions are correct.

So after considerably effort to win the HD format wars, which looks to have at the very least severely damaged the PS3’s chance to win the last generation wars, has Sony’s support for Blu-ray been worth it? While Blu-ray demand will not grow as quickly as the company had wanted, there is no evidence that Blu-ray is dying (how can there be when its demand is still growing?). And with Microsoft now firmly in the Blu-ray camp with the Xbox One, it’s pretty clear that Blu-ray will take over from DVDs as the dominant disc format. That, however, may be a hollow victory as people move away from discs altogether.

So Blu-ray’s peak will be a smaller peak that that of DVD’s, but it will still be around.

Well, I’ve definitely passed my peak for the day, so it’s time to call it. See you next week!

Weekly News Roundup (13 April 2014)

Sunday, April 13th, 2014

Oh Heartbleed, you stupid annoying thing. While none of Digital Digest’s servers used the vulnerable OpenSSL versions that is now responsible for the biggest IT crisis since the Y2K bug, you’d have to be a under-rock living Luddite to not have been affected by this horrendous bug, no matter how much you try to convince yourself that everything is still fine. The weird side effect is that people now generally know much more about OpenSSL and overflow bugs than they need to (and if you need a quick refresher, refer to xkcd).

There were other news too!

Copyright

Game of Thrones: Season 4

A new season of GoT: More nudity, larger dragons, and more pirates (of the downloading variety)

The only thing more predictable than the far too frequent appearance of gratuitous nudity in Game of Thrones episodes is the fact that a new season of it will break piracy record, and the season 4 debut did not disappoint. 300,000 simultaneous downloaders at its peak (not to mention the million downloads that took place in less than half a day), up from 160,000 a season ago, is a feat almost as amazing as the building of The Wall.

Australia once again led all other countries in piracy, the nation with 0.3% of the world’s population managed to be responsible for 11.6% of all GoT downloads. You can thank our one and only greedy cable provider, and their exclusive airing deal with HBO, for this. The deal prevents all other digital platforms, including iTunes, from providing access to new episode until after the entire season has finished airing, some months away from now. Sacrificing availability for short term profits seems extremely, well, short sighted for me – it encourages a culture of piracy that will be harder and harder to break. I just hope HBO got enough money out of it to make up for all the money they just lost on preventing people from buying season passes on iTunes.

And also expect this record to be broken again for the season finale.

——

MegaUpload Logo

It’s been a while since I’ve had to use the Megaupload logo, but it’s not everyday the MPAA/RIAA sues a dead website

Either they’re really desperate, or its more of a “kick ’em while they’re down” situation, depending on who you believe. The MPAA and RIAA have launched separate civil lawsuits against the very much dead and buried Megaupload, claiming millions in damages.

If you believe the spin by Megaupload and Kim Dotcom’s legal people, then this is simply a reaction to the stalled criminal case against Mega. If you believe the pressers from the MPAA and RIAA, then it’s about recouping the billions and billions lost due to piracy on a massive scale yada yada yada.

We all know that the DoJ has been sharing data with the MPAA and others (legally, via a secret court order, but still a morally questionable act of using tax payer resources to benefit lobbyist buddies), so is this the MPAA/RIAA swooping in to save the DoJ’s troubled case against Megaupload? Most of these civil cases are about shutting down a site, but with Megaupload already down and out, so is getting some of that sweet, sweet (frozen) Megaupload treasure the MPAA/RIAA’s main objective?

I for one find it hard to believe that the MPAA/RIAA would go to all this trouble just for the money, and since it’s not about shutting down Megaupload, this all seems to be about a victory for victory’s sake (and I would think that, given Megaupload isn’t exactly in a position to put up a staunch defense, a win here is almost guaranteed). A win here would relieve the pressure on the DoJ to win their criminal case, so this would be my guess for the motivations behind these lawsuits.

Just friends helping each other out.

High Definition

Netflix has officially started streaming 4K, but many early adopters will miss out because their TVs do not support the HEVC/H.265 codec that Netflix will be using. Most TVs announced for release this year will support HEVC/H.265, but most sets purchased before won’t support the advanced codec. It’s part of the risk of being an early adopter, but this one kind of bites because of the short time span between 4K and HEVC adoption.

Samsung 4K TV

Some 4K early adopters will rue Netflix’s decision to use HEVC for the 4K streams, as older TVs do not support it

Of course, with Google throwing their VP9 codec into the hat for serious consideration as a 4K codec, the situation could get even messier. So for those thinking about 4K, it’s probably still not quite the right time to buy in yet, even if you have the cash. Best to wait until the codec situation is resolved, and also to ensure that the TV set you want to buy has HDMI 2.0.

Then there’s Blu-ray 4K discs (I’m not talking about those “mastered in 4K” discs, which are still very much 1080p), which possibly means new hardware requirements for the TV (although I think HEVC + VP9 + HDMI 2.0 is probably all that’s needed, other than the new Blu-ray 4K player you’ll need to buy).

For now, 4K content is limited to House of Cards and a few nature documentaries. A nice teaser of the potential of 4K, but that’s it really. Most new films will have a 4K master floating around somewhere, and so it’s not inconceivable that Netflix’s 4K library will start growing exponentially once studios start providing the content.

So wait another year before seriously considering buying a 4K TV, is my opinion. All the technical stuff will have become standardized, and the content situation will have dramatically improve too.

That’s it for the week. Stay safe out there on the interwebs, it’s getting scary out there!

Weekly News Roundup (23 March 2014)

Sunday, March 23rd, 2014

A fairly short, in text rather than in content, WNR for this week. Just didn’t feel like writing too much, and I suspect you probably don’t like reading that much either.

Let’s get it done.

Copyright

Viacom Logo

Viacom and Google hugs it out, as settlement brings to an end to a tedious legal battle

Well that was tedious. The long running legal battle between Viacom and Google has finally ended, both sides having just signed an undisclosed settlement deal. Seven years in the running, it brings to the end of one of the most contentious copyright legal battles of recent time, all started when Viacom sued YouTube for $1 billion back in 2007.

Of course, the YouTube of 2007 (and actually earlier than that, since a big part of the lawsuit hinged on what had happened at YouTube before Google took over in 2006) is a lot different to the YouTube of today. Many of the things Viacom had wanted back then, are now the norm, like ContentID scanning and account bans for excessive copyright abuse.

And while piracy still exists on YouTube, the positives of the platform for content publishers like Viacom outweigh the negatives, and it’s just silly to continue this feud any longer. Which is basically what both companies have jointly said following the announcement of the settlement.

——

A good idea nearly ruined by bad execution. Nothing new, and certainly not when DRM is involved. So when Warner Bros. decided to go with UltraViolet/Flixster as the digital platform of choice for the Kickstarter backed Veronica Mars movie, backers, and investors of the film, weren’t happy.

Flixster for iOS

Veronica Mars fans and Kickstarter backers don’t like Flixster as the choice for the digital version of the movie

While the DRM-free concept is a popular one in the crowdfunding scene, Warner was never going to release Veronica Mars DRM-free. This meant that Warner went with what they know, or rather, what’s good for them, and this meant the same UltraViolet/Flixster setup they use for their disc products. But the Warner owned Flixster is not as commonly used as iTunes or Amazon, and it’s not as compatible on devices that users primarily use. This left many backers with a digital download they can’t watch on their Apple TV or Roku, and the negative comments poured on on the movie’s Kickstarter page.

UltraViolet/Flixster related hatred has made the news before, and just like last time, Warner has had to backtrack and offer monetary compensation for affected users. This time, users will be refunded the cost of their iTunes or Amazon purchase if they had a previously complaint about the Flixster version.

It’s not uncommon for studios to screw over their customers for their own shortsighted benefit, but in this case, the Kickstarter backers are the actual investors of the movie, and so Warner’s screw-up is less forgivable this time.

——

An update to last week’s story about Popcorn Time – the software has been brought back from the dead thanks to torrent site YTS, and installers and source code is available on their GitHut page. It’s impossible to really kill an open source software, as this latest development proves.

High Definition

Netflix’s CEO Reed Hastings has weighed in on the net neutrality debate in the wake of the company’s high profile deal with Comcast. Hastings wants more government action on the issue of net neutrality, or he fears that ISPs will have too much power to charge ever increasing “tolls” on bandwidth hungry companies like Netflix.

Net Neutrality

Netflix CEO says we still need strong net neutrality rules to ensure ISPs don’t get too greedy

While the Netflix/Comcast deal skirted the issue of net neutrality by dealing with the interconnect between the two companies, as opposed to preferential treatment of traffic in the last mile, the end effect may be the same, says Hastings. With ISPs consolidating market share, and the courts backing them via a silly free-market argument, net neutrality is needed more now than ever. Or, as Hastings warns, ISPs will be able to charge whatever they want from companies like Google or Netflix, just simply because they can.

They can because while there is nominally competition in the market place, most users choose to bundle their services together, which means there is less incentive and capability for them to change providers on a whim. This effectively means there is very little free-market competition to prevent ISPs from gouging companies like Netflix (whether it’s via peering agreements, or last mile hijinks), and without competition, the court’s argument that net neutrality regulation isn’t needed is an invalid one.

Netflix’s only course of action is to put up the cash to solve the problem, which is good for their customers, but eventually the cost will be passed on.

Rhetoric and ideology aside, the truth is that a free market needs strong regulation in order to ensure it remains free. And this is why a strong net neutrality rule is needed, or us consumers will ultimately be the ones being out of pocket.

Told you it was short, as we reach the end of another WNR. Enjoy what’s left of your weekend, and have a good week. See you in seven days.

Weekly News Roundup (23 February 2014)

Sunday, February 23rd, 2014

A very short WNR this week, and that’s partly my fault. I took part last night in Melbourne’s second annual White Night festival, and that and other distractions during the week meant that I just didn’t have time to scour the interwebs for interesting news stories. So as compensation, I present to you these creative commons licensed, rather common and uncreative photos of my own taking, of some scenes at White Night. This is probably the most interesting part of the WNR for this week, unfortunately.

IMG_20140223_001123 IMG_20140222_234614 IMG_20140222_213839

Here’s goes anyway.

Copyright

The Pirate Bay ship may soon sail unencumbered in the waters of the Netherlands, after the country’s second largest ISP forced anti-piracy agency BREIN to agree to a lifting of a ban on visits to the notorious piracy website. This comes after January’s ruling by The Court of The Hague which found that the banning was ineffective and anti-business.

The Pirate Bay

The Pirate Bay blocking may be about to become history in the Netherlands

Other ISPs will probably follow suit (nobody wants to be at a competitive disadvantage), and could be the clearest signal yet that Dutch anti-piracy BREIN may be throwing in the towel when it comes to its website banning ambitions.

The Court of The Hague’s ruling was based on a report that found website bannings to be ineffective in stopping piracy, and also unfairly restricts ISPs’ freedom to conduct business. BREIN has yet to decide to appeal the ruling, but even if they do, it could take years for a final decision. To continue to ban The Pirate Bay during this time, when a court has already ruled against the banning, would not be in the best interest of anyone involved, even BREIN, and perhaps this is why BREIN agreed to the lifting (even though this court decision did not apply to the ISP in question, UPC).

I’m hoping this court ruling sets the right precedent and forces anti-piracy groups to rethink their strategy on website bannings, but I suspect it won’t. It’s not the first time that these anti-piracy crusaders have ignored facts and common sense in their pursuit of a victory against piracy, and so I don’t expect anything different this time.

High Definition

You know it’s a slow news week when I have to talk about bacteria and other microorganisms in the HD/Blu-ray section. Ironically, this was actually the most interesting story of the week, as scientists have discovered a new way to use a Blu-ray player: for lab work!

Using a standard commercial Blu-ray disc and the Blu-ray player’s laser, scientist have found a way to use these to identify the type and concentration of bacteria, and to a degree of accuracy that matches much more expensive lab equipment.

I don’t know about you, this is one feature that I will demand to be part of my next Blu-ray player!

Well, that’s that for the week. I’ll try harder next week. I promise!