Archive for the ‘Movies’ Category

Weekly News Roundup (7 October 2007)

Sunday, October 7th, 2007

Once again, I’ll go through all the news items that have gone through the Digital Digest website and forum for the week.

Starting with copyright related news, Sony is once again in the headlines with Sony’s chief lawyer person saying that copying songs that you have already purchased, such as from the CD to your computer, is considered stealing. This betrays the intention of content owners such as Sony, who want you to buy a copy of the movie for every single device that you want to use it on. So if you have a PS3, a PSP, a Walkman video player and a Sony Vaio laptop, then you’re screwed. And just in case you are wondering what could happen to you if content owners find you guilty of copyright infringement, a woman found guilty of sharing 24 songs has been ordered to pay $US 220,000 to the RIAA. Although I’m still not sure whether it’s a copy protection related problem or not, but Fox’s new Blu-ray movies featuring BD+ copy protection has been found to cause problems in certain players, and requiring firmware updates to fix the problem (and if you’re lucky, the required firmware might just be available). Later reports suggested that it was the BD-J usage in these discs causing the problem, rather than BD+, since a disc without BD+ from Fox also suffers from similar problems. I don’t know what’s worse, playback failure due to BD+ or playback failure due to a basic standard feature like BD-J when all the DRM layers appear to be working. It seem the priority of the Blu-ray engineers might have been to get the DRM working first, and then worry about the other small features like playback.

Onto gaming news. The Halo 3 version of the Xbox 360 hardware appear to be using a new 65 nm CPU, which is probably Microsoft’s solution to the overheating problem the console suffers, which is indicated by red rings showing up on the 360’s power switch indicator. While Microsoft has been generous in extending the warranty from the initial 90 days, to a year and now 3 years, perhaps they can learn something from Nintendo when it comes to dealing with design faults. The Wiimote strap was notorious for breaking and usually smashing into people (if you’re lucky) or expensive electronics (not so lucky). A better strap was introduced, and Nintendo offered to replace all older straps with the new ones without cost, and this seem to solve most problems. Now, Nintendo has gone a step further by giving all existing Wii owners up to four non-slip jackets for Wiimotes free of charge – all you need to do is to give them a call with your details, and they will send them out to you. All new Wiimotes will ship with the jacket from now on. Now this is what I call commitment to service. They admitted the problem, found a solution and offered to fix everything for free even though it will cost them more than 17 million dollars – if only all companies were like this (but I guess the 360’s problem was more serious, and they have already committed a billion dollars to fix the problem). The big PS3 news of the week has been the announcement of a €400 40 GB PS3 for the EU market, set to sell for €400. The catch is that it has no backwards compatibility with PS2 titles at all, limited to only 2 USB ports and no Compact Flash/Memory Stick and SD slots. I think the console will have a matte finish too, as opposed to the glossy finish of the other versions. The bad news is that once the fully featured models sell out, this cut down version will be the only one available in Europe (and I assume, in Australia too). This is the 5th version of the console to have been released as Sony tries to make the package more attractive price wise.

In HD news, Acer is to launch what it claims to be the first PC with a combo drive, capable of playing both Blu-ray and HD DVD movies. As a supporter for format neutrality, I hope it turns out to be the first of many. Back to the Fox Blu-ray playback problems mentioned earlier – it turns out that the problem was related to the BD-Java usage of these discs, rather than a BD+ issue, at least with the “Fantastic 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer” disc. This once again highlights how Blu-ray is playing the catch up game when it comes to interactivity, with HD DVD’s equivalent HDi being used from day one to great effect (albeit not without it’s own compatibility problems at the start). When HD DVD are already starting to toy around with interactive online shopping via HD DVD movies, Blu-ray is still struggling with basic interactive content like Picture-in-Picture. And when Blu-ray profile 1.1, 2.0 are rolled out, expect more problems as discs requiring 1.1 or 2.0 players might simply fail on 1.0 players (most of which lack the secondary video/audio decode and persistent storage required to upgrade to 1.1). But the good news for Blu-ray is that the new layer of DRM, BD+, appears to be working. Meanwhile, a Japanese HD DVD presentation appear to show several Spielberg directed or produced films that will be released on HD DVD, at least in Japan. Films like Jaws, E.T, Back to the Future and Jurassic Park were shown. Spielberg has been quoted to be a Blu-ray supporter (I suspect he has been fed some non truths by Blu-ray supporter friends of his, such as how Blu-ray has better quality or how HD DVD is doomed). His movies were left out of Paramount’s HD DVD exclusive deal, for example, so it suggests that at the very least, he doesn’t want HD DVD exclusivity for his movies. The only one of his films scheduled to be released on HD has been Close Encounters on Blu-ray. But with many of his films “belonging” to HD DVD friendly studios, namely Paramount and Universal, it all depends on who has control over the release of his movies. Spielberg has always been slow to get on the next-gen video train, if you can recall how long it took his movies to come out on DVD.

See you next week.

Even more BD+ nonsense

Friday, October 5th, 2007

I just posted a link to this slashdot story in our latest news forum, following up yesterday’s blog about BD+. The effect of BD+ was worse than first though …

Samsung’s BDP-1000 can reportely play the disc, but not without error messages and stutter. Samsung’s BDP-1200 and LG’s BH100 won’t even load the discs. While almost all players will experience increased load time (an additional 2 minute wait on the PS3, for example).

The worse news is that Samsung is not planning on releasing a firmware update to fix this issue for another ‘couple’ of weeks, while LG is quicker off the line with a firmware update being planned for 3 to 4 days. Of course, when manufacturers say they will do something within a timeframe, it will usually take a bit longer.

Artists impression of the BD+ logo
Artist’s impression of the BD+ logo – nobody knows what the real logo looks like because studios want to hide the fact that discs have them, so you could not avoid them even if you wanted to

If I was a owner of one of these players and a BD+ disc, I would be absolutely incensed. Having paid for a player that is twice as much as HD DVD, for a discs that support less features than HD DVD (unless you count BD+ as a “feature”), and I still have a wait a couple of weeks just so the damn thing will play? No thanks.

Coming after days when Sony BMG’s chief lawyer said that copying a song you already own for yourself (eg. from the CD to your PC, or to your iPod) is considered stealing, I guess this means that even playing the movie you purchased can be considered stealing too. At least you are still able to copy a song to your iPod, even though you will have to live in fear of Sony’s legal department. Maybe this is the whole point of BD+,  to make sure nobody can play it so nobody would know whether it’s worth copying or not.

In a related news, Kazuhiro Tsuga, who runs Panasonic’s (Matsushita) home electronics unit said that Blu-ray could defeat HD DVD by the end of the year. If victory means not letting your own customers play movies that they have purchased legally, then I think Blu-ray has already won!

Meanwhile us HD DVD losers will just have to cry ourselves to sleep after we watch Shrek The Third, Transformers, Star Trek: TOS, Battlestar Galactica: Season One, Anchorman, Evan Almighty, Old School, The Bourne Ultimatum and various other HD DVD exclusives to be released before the end of the year. Sniffs.

Update: I’ve read somewhere that the Fantastic 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer problem is not related to BD+, and it might indeed be a BD-J (Blu-ray Disc Java) update related problem. The Day After Tomorrow disc may suffer from the same incompatibility. If so, then my Blu-ray: Buyer Beware rant last week might be more relevant than my BD+ rant this week. And even if it turns out to be a BD+ problem, then again this goes back to Blu-ray specifications and how they weren’t finalized at the time of release. Imagine what kind of problem people will be having when discs supporting Blu-ray profile 2.0 come out …

Where are my free movies? More BD+ nonsense. Is your TV HD?

Thursday, October 4th, 2007

2 more free movies, in addition to the other 7 other free moviesIf you’re not all that concerned about who will win the HD war, or don’t mind having two separate players to play your HD movies, as opposed to a combo player, now is a great time to buy a HD DVD or Blu-ray player (at least in the US). Due to the increased competition between the two HD camps, you will more than likely get a bunch of free movies whenever you purchase one of these players. For HD DVD, you get 2 movies in the box (300 and The Bourne Identity) with the new Toshiba HD-A30 player, a form to fill out to get another 5 from a list of 15, and then another 2 free movies if you by from Best Buy – that’s 9 free HD DVD movies for the $399 player – more details here. For Blu-ray, the five free movie campaign has been extended and you get to choose 5 free movies from 18 titles if you buy certain Blu-ray players, including the PS3 – more details here.

Now for those that don’t live in the US or Canada, these offers are not available. Nor are they available to those early adopters who have already made their purchase, which I think is a real shame. Yes, it’s true that there is nothing to gain from Sony or Toshiba offering free movies to existing owners (other than customer satisfaction, but how much is that worth these days), but you have to feel for those that purchased players at twice the cost, with no movies, maybe only less than a year ago. I don’t think I can be considered an early adopter, although I did buy the Xbox 360 HD DVD add-on drive within a week or two of it being released here in Australia – I did get the King Kong HD DVD movie for free, but had I purchased the drive from Amazon, I would have gotten a lot more free stuff (for cheaper as well). I’m not saying give all early adopters 9 free movies, but perhaps as a gesture of goodwill and thanks, maybe some kind of exclusive two for one deals or giveaways for these (relatively) long time supporters. At the very least, extend these free movie offers to other countries.

More BD+ Nonsense

BD+ Error ScreenEngadget HD has a story about Fox’s new BD+ Blu-ray movies, and how they won’t work in players that have not had their firmware updated. The screenshot, curtesy of Engadget HD, shows the error message shown when a non BD+ capable player tries to play a BD+ protected disc. A link, which redirects to the Blu-ray Disc Association’s updates page (with links to different manufacturer’s firmware update pages), is shown. A firmware update can be quite risky, especially if you don’t know what you are doing. For example, if the power goes out during a firmware update, the player’s software might get scrambled and only a visit to a repair center might be needed (I’m not even sure firmware updates are even covered under warranty). And for those players without Internet connection, you will have to download the firmware, burn to a CD or DVD, insert it into the player and pray that the power doesn’t cut out.  

A quick primer on BD+ (for more, read my High Definition DVD FAQ), it is yet another layer of copy protection that executes code stored on the disc to prevent playback – it might be more effective than AACS because BD+ is title specific, meaning each BD title will have it’s own copy protection logic, and a hack to get rid of it will have to be made per movie, rather than having a single key that works on a whole lot of movies in the case of AACS. Of course, professional pirate groups won’t be too bothered, and remember, only one “ripped” copy of the disc is needed to enable pirated copies to be distributed. In other words, it’s yet another layer of DRM to annoy legitimate consumer, and at the same time, do nothing to stop actual piracy. And as Engadget HD wisely recommends at the end of their article:

We’d tell you to avoid titles with BD+ for now, but there’s no way to know just from looking at the package, so just avoid just avoid these two Fox titles for now (The Day After Tomorrow and Fantastic 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer).

Is Your TV HD?

The results from our last non scientific poll has revealed that 47.6% of voters said that their TV only did SD resolutions, while 30% said it had a native resolution of 720p, and only 22.4% said that it was capable of 1080p. To be honest, that’s not too bad – a majority of people with HD capable TVs, although the type of visitors that visit Digital Digest will almost certainly be more likely to have HD already than not. If you fast forward another two years, I think the percentage of 1080p owners will be a lot higher, and I don’t think you will be able to buy a new TV that is not 1080p.

Weekly News Roundup (30 September 2007)

Sunday, September 30th, 2007

Once again, I’ll go through all the news items that have gone through the Digital Digest website and forum for this week.

Starting with copyright related news again, some DRM advocates are worried that there might be a consumer backlash towards DRM (you don’t say!). I mean it’s not like there was a DRM related revolt on Digg earlier this year or anything, and I’m sure Apple/EMI and Amazon launching DRM-free music was just a coincidence, and in no way related to a consumer backlash. Torrent site Demonoid has been shut down by the Canadian RIA. Torrent sites usually only link to torrent files, and not the actual copyrighted content, but in the greater scheme of things, providing any assistance to copyright infringement is going to be risky, whether they host the actual file or not. I would like to see some separation between torrent sites and legitimate sites like Google Video, who are under renewed pressure this week over users uploaded pirated content – the main aim of torrent sites is to offer pirated content, whereas Google Video and other video sharing sites have pirated content because they cannot control their numerous users. Then again, there are video sharing sites that advertise free movies and encourage users to upload them, so they again should be treated differently. And then there is “Movie Night” on school campuses. Showing movies in common rooms or public areas is technically “broadcasting” and is against the terms of the copyright agreement, but how much does that really hurt the movie studios, so much so that lawsuits need to be launched? What’s next, not being showing to watch movies with people other than your immediate family?

Onto gaming news. Sony says that it can catch up to the Xbox 360 by March next year. I would say that if they don’t at least achieve this, then the PS3 is in serious trouble. The PS3 is the cheapest Blu-ray player around, and actually represents good value if you want next-gen gaming + HD movie playback, but it still hasn’t been able to beat the Xbox 360 + HD DVD add-on drive in sales since launch. Add to that the Xbox 360’s better range of games and exclusives, it’s not looking great for the PS3 compared to how well the PS2 did at this stage of its release. Can Sony claim a huge market share like it did with the PS2? I don’t think so and not being able to hold on to the market the PS2 created means a defeat for Sony no matter which way you look at it. Sony will hope that’s it’s new slim PSP bundle will at least claim a bigger market share in the handheld gaming market, a market dominated by Nintendo for some time now. But the big news of the week has been the launch of Halo 3. Even the news of scratched discs didn’t slow down sales, with Halo 3 breaking all gaming and even movie box office records on the first day. When video games start making more money than big Hollywood blockbusters like Spider-Man 3, something has changed in the way entertainment is delivered. It’s no wonder then that there has been more and more games to movie conversion, rather than the reverse, lately (Hitman the movie is that one I’m waiting for).

In HD news, it seems site like us are either not doing our jobs, or people are not visiting our sites (the most likely explanation, and I’m sure that the 10 people that read this blog will agree with me here). Consumers just don’t seem to understand HD with only 11% feeling they understand HD completely, and even HDTV owners don’t seem to understand. The situation is not just limited to the US either, with Australian consumers faring even worse. It’s a shame, because HD really is quite wonderful … people who have enjoyed proper HD will never want to go back to standard definition. And if you’ve already jumped on the HD movie bandwagon (in particularly, the HD DVD one), then you can enjoy state of the art interactive features from future titles such as Shrek the Third, in addition to the superb video and audio quality. But speaking of interactive features, Blu-ray is still playing a game of catch-up, and consumers will be the victim once again (no wonder they are confused about HD). As I’ve blogged previously, Blu-ray has really screwed the pooch on the issue of hardware standards, and now Blu-ray owners may need to replace their less than a year old Blu-ray player because it doesn’t have all the required features for future Blu-ray movies. Us HD DVD owners are feeling pretty smug about it all because the HD DVD standard has been finalized from day one and includes all the advanced interactive features that Blu-ray owners might not be seeing until next year. And did I mention that HD DVD is region-free? I know I shouldn’t go on and on about region-free, but it really is wonderful to have it. There’s not a lot of HD DVD movies on sale in Australia (and the ones on sale are too expensive), but because of the region-free status, I can import movies from the US or UK, usually at a lower price and faster release date. Unlike DVDs, with the NTSC/PAL difference, HD DVDs don’t have this difference so the US version is either likely to be identical, or in most cases, superior to the local release. Studios and local distributors may not like it, but it’s partly their fault isn’t it for not releasing identical versions in a timely manner. My US import to my local purchase ratio is at 3:1 at the moment.

And that’s all folks for this week. See you next week.

Blu-ray: Buyer Beware

Saturday, September 29th, 2007

If you are looking to buy a Blu-ray player right now, be careful, as not all Blu-ray players are created equally.

As this news article explains quite well, there are in fact 3 different classes of Blu-ray players – something that most people are unaware of. These classes, or “profiles”, describe the compulsory feature set that the player must support, unlike HD DVD, which has a single standard specification when it comes to things like extra features and Internet connectivity (it does have to different “levels” to describe hardware features like on-board audio decoding, and support for additional add-on storage). The earliest Blu-ray players are profile 1.0 (Grace Period Profile), then 1.1 (Final Standard Profile) and finally, 2.0 (BD-Live). Only profile 2.0 players will feature the same interactive and Internet enabled content that is supported by all HD DVD players from day one, but as the article points out, neither profile 1.1 or 2.0 is mandatory at the moment and players released now do not have to be certified for 1.1 compatibility until November 1st, 2007. Why did the Blu-ray group sell players without having a “Final Standard”, especially ones that costs way more than HD DVD players, one can only imagine (perhaps they were too busy trying to fit in the 3 levels of copy protection, and didn’t have time to work on the actual features of the players).

Daewoo DBP-1000 is Profile 2.0 certifiedWhen profile 1.1 and 2.0 players rolls out, Blu-ray will have more persistent storage than HD DVD (most HD DVD players have 128 MB, whereas BD 1.1 requires 256 MB and 2.0 will have a full GB – the Xbox 360 add-on drive has 192 MB currently). Persistent storage is used to store things like bookmarks, downloaded content. HD DVD performance level 2 players will have the ablity for you to hook up additional storage devices (such as USB memory sticks) to use a persistent storage, which one might argue is a much better (and portable) solution than having internal storage.

So what will happen to people who own profile 1.0 players? Well, some of them can get a software upgrade which will add some of the new software interactive features (the PS3 being the easiest to upgrade, since it has the hardware to make it work). People who own 1.0/1.1 players might even be able to upgrade to 2.0 through software if their player has enough persistent storage, an Ethernet port and enough processing power (very unlikely though). If an upgrade is viable, the upgrading process is a firmware update, and if the player does not have Internet connection (very unlikely if it’s a 1.0 player, unless it’s the PS3), then it means downloading the firmware on your computer, burning to CD/DVD and then inserting the disc into the player … not exactly something that your average consumer will feel at ease with.

Is there a chance that future Blu-ray movies won’t play on your 1.0 or 1.1 player? Yes. Or at the very least, the extra features that require 1.1/2.0 will fail to work, or produce weird playback problems. The head guy over at Denon gave out a very definitive “maybe not” statement a couple of months ago regarding whether profile 1.0 players will play profile 1.1/2.0 movies. If people are really stuck with an 1.0 player that can’t be upgraded, they will have to buy a new 1.1 or 2.0 player to benefit from the full set of Blu-ray features, which is quite ridiculous since many of these 1.0 player are not even a year old yet.

One of the main reasons that Paramount quoted for dropping Blu-ray was the confusion over profiles – they had to test each title under each profile, but the need for 1.0 compatibility meant that titles might have to be limited in extra features. What they did was to produce the HD DVD version of the title first with full features, and then port that over to Blu-ray and remove features that didn’t work. Even then, it did not guarantee that the movie will work on all players, since there are so many versions out there. Their stance of dropping Blu-ray for 18 months make sense, the profiles would have been settled and the only players on sale by then would be profile 2.0 players. While HD DVD owners are enjoying the advanced features for titles such as Shrek The Third and Transformers, Blu-ray owners will be left there sitting and wondering if their player will work with future titles.

My advice? Don’t buy a Blu-ray player until profile 2.0 is available, or if you have to buy one now, buy the PS3 which may only need a software update due to it’s flexible hardware. If all this seems quite troubling, thanks to some very bad decision making from the Blu-ray group, then perhaps the settled specifications that HD DVD offers might suit you better. I have the HD DVD add-on drive for my Xbox 360, but I won’t be buying a standalone HD player until a dual-format (with Blu-ray profile 2.0 support) comes out, which seems to be at least a year away (and even then, it might be too expensive).

Update: Seeing as this relatively old blog entry has just been linked in a few places, I thought it prudent to post an update, as since this post I have purchased a PS3 for Blu-ray playback. The main reason I chose the PS3 as my Blu-ray player of choice is that it had the potential to be upgraded to Profile 1.1, 2.0 and beyond (Profile 1.1. compatibility was released as a firmware update a few weeks after I purchased the machine). There’s no technical reason why it can’t be upgraded to 2.0, and Sony has been quite vocal on getting 2.0 support on the PS3 sooner rather than later. This is why the PS3 is still and will most likely for a while, be the Blu-ray player of choice (the advanced nature of the hardware means faster loading and responsiveness than all other standalones, so there’s another bonus too). Just make sure you get the official Blu-ray remote, as playing back movies using the wireless gamepad is a bit of a pain. More information and Blu-ray buying tips in my new Blu-ray and HD DVD Buyer’s Guide.