Archive for the ‘Movies’ Category

DVD Pet Peeve #3

Sunday, April 22nd, 2007
NTSC Warning … not very visible or helpful
NTSC Warning (circled in red) … not very visible or helpful

Why do studios insist on releasing NTSC content in PAL regions? Is it because they are lazy? Cost savings? Or just because they don’t give a rat’s arse about people who actually pay their salaries (us, the customers)?

A lot of people still don’t have equipment that can play or display NTSC content, and is it really that hard to produce a new transfer for the PAL regions, especially when there are so many countries that uses PAL (Europe, UK, Australia). Notable NTSC releases in Australia includes The Goonies, Willy Wonka and The Chocolate Factory (only the full-frame version is available as well) and my recently purchased copy of Dilbert: The Complete Series. Often, the NTSC warnings are not very visible nor helpful, since most people don’t even know the NTSC/PAL difference (nor should they be expected to know).

On a related note, if you have a Pioneer Plasma that has PureCinema mode, you should have an “Advanced” option which basically does 3:3 pulldown, playing back 24 FPS content at 72 Hz. 3:3 pulldown triples every frame to get the required 72 Hz refresh rate, and what you get is a slightly smoother picture compared to standard 2:3 pulldown (the “Standard” PureCinema mode) . I use this mode to play back all my NTSC DVDs. For my (3 year old) model, 3:3 pulldown only works when the input is interlaced, so I have my upscaling DVD player set to 1080i 60Hz mode when playing back NTSC discs, and then enable 3:3 pulldown – the improved smoothness of panning is immediately noticeable. PAL discs are at 25 FPS, so I set the DVD player to 720p (native resolution of the TV) @ 50 Hz.

DVD Pet Peeve #2

Sunday, April 15th, 2007

This week’s pet peeve is stuff you can’t skip on DVDs. These include studio/distributor trailers, warning notices, anti-piract messags and even movie trailers.

Yes I would, if stealing ahandbag meant that I wouldn’t be forced to watch this stupid trailer again
Yes I would, if stealing a handbag meant that I wouldn’t be forced to watch this stupid trailer again

If the Internet has taught has anything is that people like the freedom of being able to get and use information without being limited to a particular process or method. The freedom, therefore, to choose what you want to watch and what you don’t want to watch is essential. Being forced to watch some stupid studio trailer (Universal Pictures, I’m looking at you) that you’ve seen about a million times, or being told that you are a terrorist because you made a copy of a movie for your mother, is just plain annoying. Sometimes you are forced to wait up to 5 minutes before you can get to the movie, and that’s just not good enough. Ripping DVDs to get rid of these UOPs (User Operation Prohibitions) seems to be the only method, except that it’s illegal in most countries.

Many studios don’t employ these heavy handed tactics to force you to watch things, and they need to be applauded for doing so. Others should hang their heads in shame.

Legal DVD Quality Downloads – More Ideas

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

A few more ideas that popped into head following my blog entry the other day (Legal DVD Quality Downloads – Dream or Reality?).

I think it would be great (if not somewhat ironic) that legal DVD downloads be distributed using bittorrent technology. It really is the best and fastest way to distribute large files, and it saves money for the distributors.

Digital downloads would also make distribution of hard to find/out of print titles possible. It is often not worth it commercially for studios to release old and rare movies, but if they do it online, there is no production cost involved.

And once bandwidth becomes faster and cheaper, perhaps HD titles can be distributed in the same way.

And since everything will be delivered digitally, why not allow customizations? For example, I could choose a different style of main menu, which language and subtitle tracks I want to be included in the download, and also which extra features to have (discounts available for choosing the movie only version perhaps). Exclusive material not found on the physical DVD version might also be made available, to be downloaded for an additional fee. The possibilities are endless, and I really shouldn’t be doing the studio’s work for them by coming up with these ideas (will sell ideas for money!!).

Legal DVD Quality Downloads – Dream or Reality?

Tuesday, April 10th, 2007

To be able to download a full DVD quality version of the latest Hollywood movie, and for it to be completely legal, for now seems like just a dream. Hollywood studios are always talking about how much money they are losing to illegal movie downloads, yet they offer no alternatives to the traditional optical media, or when they do, it’s DRM’d crap that’s nowhere near DVD quality (but as expensive, if not more so).

People who have been using media centers are well aware of the ease in which digital content can be played back without having the physical (optical) media. Everything is organized and easy to access, and searching is much easier. No discs means less clutter, and the loading time is greatly reduced.

The Kaleidescape System
Kaleidescape – The ultimate system (if not a bit too rich for my wallet)
Up until now, many people have been doing the “illegal” thing and copying their own DVDs to media centers. Kaleidescape, for example, is a commercial solution for keeping your DVDs in a digital library, and they even went as far as winning (at least for now, before appeals) a lawsuit bought against them by the DVD Copy Control Association.

Is it really too hard for the studios to start allowing legal DVD quality downloads? The price, the risk of piracy, the technical problem have all be quoted as reasons for not having legal DVD downloads.

I theorize that if DVD quality downloads are available for $10 per movie (with sub-DVD quality versions at $5), then I think you will see a huge decrease in the amount of movies being pirated (plus make a tidy profit at the same time). Why pirate an illegal inferior XviD version (possibly fake, and loaded with virus/trojan executables) when you can grab the legal version with better quality and faster downloading for only $5?

DivX Logo
DivX would be perfect for distributing legal movies in sub-DVD quality

These downloads should be also be DRM free – DRM hardly works anyway in stopping copying, but it does work quite well in making life miserable for customers by limiting interoperability. The reason why people use DivX/XviD is the wide spread support for it in hardware, and legal downloads should offer the same advantages. Free software should also be included to make it easy to burn these files to DVDs, and for these burned DVDs to be as compatible as real DVDs you buy in the shops. This will help media companies who also have investment in hardware playback devices, as improve interoperability means more playback devices being sold and used.

The biggest technical challenge is bandwidth. Most people (at least here in Australia) are on a 10 to 30 GB per month limit – this only equals 6 DVD downloads (or 3 DVD downloads if they include extra features or are overly long), and it will probably take the average user (on 1.5 Mbps download speeds) 7 or 8 hours to download a single DVD. But you could argue that if people are already downloading tons of illegal stuff, then they aren’t all that concerned about the technical limitations or have found ways around it. Certainly offering lower quality (DivX/XviD) legal downloads would solve the problem for many people.

Studios should also work together with ISPs to offer downloads that won’t eat into your monthly allowance, perhaps even investing in their own high speed network designed for DVD downloads – this in itself is worth the $10 you pay for each DVD download in my opinion.

Lost on iTunes
Episodes of Lost are already available to download on iTunes, but is not at DVD quality and is DRM protected to make DVD burning difficult if not impossible (within legal limits)

With TV shows on DVDs being quite popular, there could also be a model where you download each episode as it is aired in DVD quality. Let’s say that a typical TV season consisting of 20 episodes costs $40 for the DVD box set, then if you market each downloadable episode at $2.00 (the price at which some TV episodes are already available to download), many people will be tempted to download them. In fact, many are already downloading episodes of Lost and Desperate Housewives for the same price through iTunes, even though it’s not at DVD quality and is loaded with DRM goodness. At the end of the season, you should then be able to run a software and turn these downloaded episodes into a proper DVD set (complete with menus, but no extras). An offer of a discount on the DVD box set (with extras) could then be offered, and I think most people will buy that as well. The possibilities are endless, and the profits for studios and TV networks will increase.

So why aren’t studios doing this? Perhaps they are still holding on to the old concepts of media distribution, and tape/discs do offer more control in terms of who is viewing your content. Perhaps they are also afraid of opening this digital pandora’s box, afraid that a single downloaded copy will be distributed to millions of people with no profits to them. I don’t think these are huge concerns, and in the words of Michael Eisner*, former CEO of Disney:

History has shown that one of the best deterrents to pirated product is providing legitimate product at appropriate prices. In the music industry, we have already seen that people will gladly pay fair prices for legally-produced product even when it can be easily reproduced and unlawful copies can be easily acquired.

Wise words indeed. Let’s hope the studios are listening.

* Thanks to Doom9.net and 2600 for the quote

DVD Pet Peeve #1

Sunday, April 8th, 2007

This is a feature which I’ll post weekly (or thereabouts) in which I outline my completely irrational ramblings about certain DVD features which I just don’t like.

First in the firing line is two disc DVD editions. No, I don’t hate these, but rather, I hate the completely random way in which the 2 discs are organised within the DVD sleeve – should disc 1 (the main movie) sit on top in the swing tray (see picture below), or should it sit on the bottom in the more traditional position?

Some studios like to put the discs in numerical order, disc 1 on top, disc 2 on the bottom. Some prefer to have the main movie on the bottom, and have the extras disc swing around and be more prone to damage. Some studios just don’t care and randomly chooses a location. And many studios don’t even bother to number the discs anyways, just to make it all a bit more interesting.

Personally, I prefer having the main movie disc at the bottom and not in the swing tray. This way, the main movie disc won’t move around during transport (but to be fair, discs placed in the swing tray is unlikely to be damaged in any case). On average, I have to “correct” this problem on 80% of the 2-disc edition DVDs that I buy. It’s not that annoying, but I’ve always wondered how studios decide which disc goes where. Maybe they even have an executive in charge of making this decision!

You can vote for your method of 2-disc management down below.

2 Disc Editions - How I organise them

[poll=2]