Archive for April, 2007

8 Mbit ADSL, 6 GB download limit?

Friday, April 27th, 2007

That’s right. My current ISP, iiNet, has just launched some new broadband plans (the “broadband1” plans). The new offerings now include a 8 Mbit/s plan, but strangely, only offers 3 GB of downloads during peak usage hours (12pm to 2am), with a further 3 GB during off-peak hours. The 8 Mbit/s is a theoretical maximum, so most likely I’ll get between 4 Mbit/s and 6 Mbit/s – even at 4 Mbit/s, this means that if I download at the maximum speed continously, I’ll use up the 3 GB limit in less than 2 hours! After the limit is reached, the speed is capped to 64 kbit/s, or a nice and speedy 8 KB/s. Not only that, this is actually the most expensive plan available for home users – there is no option to get more bandwidth! Even for a somewhat broadband-backwards country as Australia, these plans are ridiculous (the phased out set iiNet plans used to include a 30 GB plan, albeit at a higher cost).

iiNet’s ADSL2 (“broadband2”) plans are a little more generous, 10 GB peak/10 GB offpeak, but the problem is that ADSL2 is only available in very select areas (as determined by where iiNet install their own hardware DSLAMs), and certainly not available in my area. I know it is in iiNet’s interests to promote their ADSL2 plans, and if I had ADSL2 in my area, I would sign up immediately. But the case is that I’m stuck on “broadband1”, and I get punished by these crappy plans because iiNet haven’t bothered to install the proper hardware in my area.

There are business plans available which gives more bandwidth, but I would have to spend $20 more to get roughly the same plan I am on now (but with an upgrade to 8 Mbit/s), bringing my yearly ADSL bill to $AUD 1908 ($US 1575). I would have to bundle their VOIP service, which I don’t need, and pay extra (included in the $1908) for a static IP address, which I do need.

Of course, the situations is more complicated than it seems, with Telstra’s (our major telecommunication provider) wholesale ADSL policies being the source of the pricing problems. But the rival broadband provider, Internode, is able to provide the same 8 Mbit/s connection, with 40 GB of bandwidth that can be used anytime (no peak usage times), a faster 128 Kbit/s cap, and all of this at $20 $10 cheaper (edited 5/5/07: me bad at maths) than my current iiNet (phased out) plan (or a massive $40 per month savings on iiNet’s closest comparable plan) – so if your competitors can do it, why can’t you iiNet?

Churn baby, churn.

HD DVD is the winner. No, it’s Blu-ray. No, it’s HD DVD …

Thursday, April 26th, 2007

So who should you believe?

Blu-ray Logo

A couple of days ago, the Blu-ray camp came out with some impressive figures for the latest quarter. According to these claims, 70% of high definition movies sold during the first quarter of 2007 has been Blu-ray movies, and sales have reached the one million mark.

HD DVD Logo

Now, the HD DVD camp has hit back and submitted their own figures, which show that HD DVD movies have only sold 2000 units less than Blu-ray, and will soon pass the one million mark as well. However, the significance of this figure has to be put into context, as HD DVD was launched earlier than Blu-ray and if Blu-ray has managed to outsell HD DVD in this short time, then the 70% figure might not be too far off. The offer of a free copy of Casino Royale for the first few hundred thousand registered purchasers of the PS3 might also have affected this figure (assuming they’ve counted these giveaways as “sales”).

As for hardware, if you do not count the PS3, than HD DVD has a clear 4 to 1 lead, with more than 100,000 units sold already. The PS3 is interesting as it is hard to determine if people purchasing the PS3 is using it for games only, for HD movies only or for both.

So back to the question I posed at the top of this blog? Who should you believe? At this point, no one. A million movie sales is nothing compared to DVD sales at the moment, and with giveaways and promotions at launch, it will take time for these figures to stabilise and show a true picture of what is happening. I personally don’t believe either camp will come out as clear winners, and us consumers will just have to live with dual formats, making us the real losers in all of this.

DVD Pet Peeve #3

Sunday, April 22nd, 2007
NTSC Warning … not very visible or helpful
NTSC Warning (circled in red) … not very visible or helpful

Why do studios insist on releasing NTSC content in PAL regions? Is it because they are lazy? Cost savings? Or just because they don’t give a rat’s arse about people who actually pay their salaries (us, the customers)?

A lot of people still don’t have equipment that can play or display NTSC content, and is it really that hard to produce a new transfer for the PAL regions, especially when there are so many countries that uses PAL (Europe, UK, Australia). Notable NTSC releases in Australia includes The Goonies, Willy Wonka and The Chocolate Factory (only the full-frame version is available as well) and my recently purchased copy of Dilbert: The Complete Series. Often, the NTSC warnings are not very visible nor helpful, since most people don’t even know the NTSC/PAL difference (nor should they be expected to know).

On a related note, if you have a Pioneer Plasma that has PureCinema mode, you should have an “Advanced” option which basically does 3:3 pulldown, playing back 24 FPS content at 72 Hz. 3:3 pulldown triples every frame to get the required 72 Hz refresh rate, and what you get is a slightly smoother picture compared to standard 2:3 pulldown (the “Standard” PureCinema mode) . I use this mode to play back all my NTSC DVDs. For my (3 year old) model, 3:3 pulldown only works when the input is interlaced, so I have my upscaling DVD player set to 1080i 60Hz mode when playing back NTSC discs, and then enable 3:3 pulldown – the improved smoothness of panning is immediately noticeable. PAL discs are at 25 FPS, so I set the DVD player to 720p (native resolution of the TV) @ 50 Hz.

DVD Pet Peeve #2

Sunday, April 15th, 2007

This week’s pet peeve is stuff you can’t skip on DVDs. These include studio/distributor trailers, warning notices, anti-piract messags and even movie trailers.

Yes I would, if stealing ahandbag meant that I wouldn’t be forced to watch this stupid trailer again
Yes I would, if stealing a handbag meant that I wouldn’t be forced to watch this stupid trailer again

If the Internet has taught has anything is that people like the freedom of being able to get and use information without being limited to a particular process or method. The freedom, therefore, to choose what you want to watch and what you don’t want to watch is essential. Being forced to watch some stupid studio trailer (Universal Pictures, I’m looking at you) that you’ve seen about a million times, or being told that you are a terrorist because you made a copy of a movie for your mother, is just plain annoying. Sometimes you are forced to wait up to 5 minutes before you can get to the movie, and that’s just not good enough. Ripping DVDs to get rid of these UOPs (User Operation Prohibitions) seems to be the only method, except that it’s illegal in most countries.

Many studios don’t employ these heavy handed tactics to force you to watch things, and they need to be applauded for doing so. Others should hang their heads in shame.

Legal DVD Quality Downloads – More Ideas

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

A few more ideas that popped into head following my blog entry the other day (Legal DVD Quality Downloads – Dream or Reality?).

I think it would be great (if not somewhat ironic) that legal DVD downloads be distributed using bittorrent technology. It really is the best and fastest way to distribute large files, and it saves money for the distributors.

Digital downloads would also make distribution of hard to find/out of print titles possible. It is often not worth it commercially for studios to release old and rare movies, but if they do it online, there is no production cost involved.

And once bandwidth becomes faster and cheaper, perhaps HD titles can be distributed in the same way.

And since everything will be delivered digitally, why not allow customizations? For example, I could choose a different style of main menu, which language and subtitle tracks I want to be included in the download, and also which extra features to have (discounts available for choosing the movie only version perhaps). Exclusive material not found on the physical DVD version might also be made available, to be downloaded for an additional fee. The possibilities are endless, and I really shouldn’t be doing the studio’s work for them by coming up with these ideas (will sell ideas for money!!).