![\"Copyright\"](\"http:\/\/www.digital-digest.com\/blog\/DVDGuy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/04\/copyright.gif\" "\\"Copyright\\"")
<\/p>\nAnother week gone, and we’re mid way through June, which is mid-way through the year. 2015 has gone by pretty quickly, I have to say, maybe too quick at times. Much like this somewhat shorter than usual WNR, which I’m sure you’ll get through pretty quickly (maybe too quickly) too.<\/p>\n
Here it is …<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"EU](\"http:\/\/www.digital-digest.com\/blog\/DVDGuy\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/eu_flag.jpg\")
<\/a>The EU wants to remove copyright restrictions, which they say is encouraging piracy<\/p><\/div>\n
The EU is pressing ahead with its plans reform copyright laws, to make it fairer to consumers and remove many of the restrictions that exist within EU countries.\u00a0The European Commission VP in charge of this new copyright strategy, dubbed the\u00a0Digital Single Market, says that current copyright laws allows rights-holders to place restrictions on legal content, restrictions that\u00a0Andrus Ansip says are driving people to piracy<\/a>.<\/p>\n Instead of tougher laws that punish downloaders, something that Ansip says is untenable (68% of film viewers in the EU download pirated movies – “to put 68% of people in jail is not really a good idea,” says Ansip), he wants legislation that encourages the spread of legal content, even if it means banning things like geo-blocking within EU countries.<\/p>\n It’s something rights-holders won’t like. While all EU countries use the same currency, the wealth disparity\u00a0between EU countries means that citizens in one country may be able to afford to pay more for the same content, than citizens in another country. It’s this wealth disparity that\u00a0Big Content likes to exploit,\u00a0by making sure they squeeze\u00a0as much as possible out of each paying customer. In the worst case, an entire platform, like Spotify, could end not not being available in some countries due to these kind of\u00a0artificial barriers.<\/p>\n So while the EU is clearly moving into the direction that brings better\u00a0access to content, Big Content is heading in the other direction, still pushing ahead with\u00a0content blocking\u00a0to solve the piracy problem. The latest strategy involves getting domain registrars involved in the process<\/a>, but Big Content is\u00a0finding that it’s meeting some resistance from ICANN<\/a>, the non-profit responsible for managing domain names. The ICANN says it refuses to be copyright cops, to police content, simply because it’s responsibilities simply does not extend to content. Pointing domain names to servers is basically what the domain naming system is all about – it should not matter to ICANN at least what the domain name is, and what server it is pointing to.\u00a0Just because it’s easier to\u00a0force registrars to do something about piracy (as opposed to going after the owners of the website), doesn’t make it right.<\/p>\n Are users abusing Steam’s new refund system?<\/p><\/div>\n By finally making refunds available, Steam seems to have finally listened to customers, and it also represents a major step in the right direction in terms of digital consumer rights. However, it appears\u00a0some users at least have started to abuse the refund system<\/a>, which promises refunds, no questions asked, within 14 days of purchase as long as you’ve played less than\u00a0two hours in the game (which describes about 95% of my Steam game library, by the way).<\/p>\n Some indie game developers are reporting refund rates of up to 72%, meaning more than 2 in 3 users bought the game, played it, and then got their money back.\u00a0While this might indicate some kind of problem with the game, most of the time, the heavily refunded games still receive positive ratings from gamers.<\/p>\n This means that people may be using the refund system to play games without paying, at least for up to two hours (which\u00a0while probably not enough to finish the game, but might be enough for many users). With Steam not even asking users why they’re seeking a refund, the system does sound like one that’s\u00a0maybe too biased towards the consumers, something that rarely happens with digital goods.<\/p>\n The problem has become so bad, that some developers are even thinking of adding DRM to their game, something that they would never have considered\u00a0in the past.\u00a0And this is a development that\u00a0benefits nobody, really.<\/p>\n There has to be a middle ground though,\u00a0one that gives consumers the same rights with digital goods as they have with physical goods, but also ensures that people cannot abuse it\u00a0as a way to play games without paying.<\/p>\n ——<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a>